Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The scope of the journal includes agrophysical aspects covering the following disciplines:

  • Agronomy, plant science, horticulture, and plant fertility
  • Soil science, soil microbiology, soil management systems, land use practices, and soil dynamics
  • Plant breeding and genetics
  • Biophysics
  • Agricultural and biological engineering (including genetic engineering)
  • Hydrological physics, electrophysics, and heat-mass transfer
  • Climate, micro-climate, and climate change
  • Mathematical and experimental modeling (including fuzzy logic and sets)
  • Electrophysical, optical, and mechanical properties of agricultural materials
  • Environmental impacts of agriculture and forestry
  • Agricultural computer applications
  • Agricultural economics
  • Aquaculture and aquatic ecosystems
  • Food science
  • Irrigation and water management
  • Geographic Information Systems, geocomputation, and spatial statistics

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The paper will be peer-reviewed by three experts; two reviewers from outside and one editor from the journal.  The reviewers will provide a Review Form.  All papers will be checked the plagiarism issue through two methods: reviewer check and plagiarism prevention tool.  The review process may take an estimated 2-3 weeks.  Notification of the results of review will be send to the author by e-mail.  Authors will revise their paper according to recommendations of reviewers before acceptance.

 

Publication Frequency

Journal publication will be quarterly: published in March, June, September, and December.

 

Open Access Policy

The journal provides immediate open access to its content.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Policy

Diversity in geographical distribution of editors Diversity in geographical distribution of authors English language abstracts.
EAJ has not a waiver policy (for developing country authors etc).

 

Google scholar citations of articles published in European Agrophysical Journal

Utilization of fuzzy set theory for interpretation of data of investigations of soil contamination by heavy metals
V Badenko, D Kurtener, E Krueger
European Agrophysical Journal 1 (1), 25-41, 2014
Number of citation 8

 

Analysis of environmental factors which limit plant growth using fuzzy modeling
D Kurtener, E Krueger
European Agrophysical Journal 1 (4), 134-144, 2014
Number of citation 4

 

Utilization of fuzzy computing in agrophysics
D Kurtener, VP Yakushev
European Agrophysical Journal 1 (2), 63-78, 2014
Number of citation 4

 

Evaluation of Germination of Wheat Seeds Using Fuzzy Modelling: Application of Microfertilizer with Magnetic Treatment of Water and Seeds
M Ostrovskij, E Krueger, D Kurtener, SV Tsukanov, E Maklyuk
European Agrophysical Journal 1 (1), 1-13, 2014
Number of citation 4

 

Zoning of an agricultural field accounting for the significances of parameters affecting productivity
HA Torbert, D Kurtener, E Krueger
European Agrophysical Journal 1 (3), 106-113, 2014
Number of citation 3

 

Seed assessment using fuzzy logic and gas discharge visualization data
M Arkhipov, E Krueger, D Kurtener, NS Priyatkin, AS Bondarenko
European Agrophysical Journal 1 (4), 124-133, 2014
Number of citation 2

 

Fuzzy Multi-Attributive Analyzes of Organic-Mineral Fertilizer" Stimulayf" and “Humate Sodium”: Application for Cultivation of Dracocephalum L.
D Kurtener, E Krueger, AA Komarov, MY Lavrukov, NM Nayda
European Agrophysical Journal 1 (1), 14-24, 2014
Number of citation 2

 

Evaluation of soil disturbance using fuzzy indicator approach
HA Torbert, D Kurtener, E Krueger
European Agrophysical Journal 2 (4), 106-115, 2014
Number of citation 1

 

History of agrophysics: the creative activity of AF Chudnovsky
E Krueger, D Kurtener
European Agrophysical Journal 1 (4), 145-151, 2014
Number of citation 1

 

History of agrophysics: book of AF Chudnovsky “What is agrophysics?”
E Krueger, D Kurtener
European Agrophysical Journal 1 (2), 54-62, 2014
Number of citation 1

 

Cited references

References are cited in Roman script (see publication template).

 

Requirements for Authors

Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

 

Requirements for Editors

Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

 

Requirements for Reviewers

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.